CA, Inc. v. AFSCME Employees Pension Plan, No. 329, 2008 (July 17, 2008)
In CA, Inc. v. AFSCME Employees Pension Plan, the Delaware Supreme Court held that a proposed bylaw amendment relating to reimbursement of proxy contest expenses would, if adopted, cause CA to violate Delaware law. CA sought no-action relief under Rule 14a-8 permitting it to exclude from its proxy materials a proposal that stockholders adopt the bylaw amendment, and the Securities and Exchange Commission certified two questions of law to the Delaware Supreme Court. Although the Delaware Supreme Court held that the proposed bylaw was a proper subject for stockholder action under the General Corporation Law, it also concluded that, if adopted, the bylaw would cause CA to violate Delaware law because it would deprive CA’s directors of their full power to exercise their fiduciary duty to decide whether or not reimbursement of proxy expenses would be appropriate in each specific case.
Related Materials
About Potter Anderson
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP is one of the largest and most highly regarded Delaware law firms, providing legal services to regional, national, and international clients. With more than 100 attorneys, the firm centers its practice on corporate and alternative entity law and litigation, commercial litigation, bankruptcy, intellectual property, labor and employment, and real estate.