Delaware Courts Interpret Survival Clauses Relating to Contractual Representations

January 2014
Kevin R. Shannon and Berton W. Ashman, Jr.

The Delaware Court of Chancery has issued two recent decisions—GRT, Inc. v. Marathon GFT Technology, Ltd. and ENI Holdings, LLC.v. KBR Group Holdings, LLC—holding contract indemnification claims to be time-barred because the litigation was not commenced before the representations at issue terminated. The decisions, which interpreted indemnification and survival provisions similar to those found in many merger or stock/asset purchase agreements, are significant for both deal lawyers and litigators. Among other things, in contrast to some prior cases, the court held that it was not sufficient to provide “written notice” of a claim prior to the termination date. Rather, based on the contract provisions at issue, the court held that a party must commence litigation prior to the termination date of the representations at issue or the claim will be barred.

Related Professionals

Media Contact

Lisa Altman, Jaffe PR, Senior Vice President

About Potter Anderson

Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP is one of the largest and most highly regarded Delaware law firms, providing legal services to regional, national, and international clients. With more than 100 attorneys, the firm’s practice is centered on corporate law, corporate litigation, intellectual property, commercial litigation, bankruptcy, labor and employment, and real estate.

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.