Increased Judicial Scrutiny of Non-Monetary Settlements of Merger Litigation Threatens Business Model of Some Plaintiffs’ Lawyers

November 9, 2015
  |  
Article
Donald J. Wolfe, Jr. and Christopher N. Kelly
The Temple 10-Q: Temple's Business Law Magazine

In recent years, the percentage of corporate mergers and acquisitions challenged through stockholder litigation has more than doubled.  In 2007, 44% of deals valued over $100 million were the subject of stockholder lawsuits; by 2014, the number was 93%.  Merger litigation has become both reflexive and ubiquitous; plaintiffs’ lawyers often file complaints on behalf of stockholders within days of the public announcement of a merger, with little or no pre-suit investigation.  Many of these lawsuits are accompanied by requests for preliminary injunctive relief, typically targeting allegedly inadequate disclosures as the source of purported imminent and irreparable harm, together with attending applications for expedited treatment, as to which the applicable standard is quite low.  Thus, even though the suit may lack merit either as to the allegedly deficient disclosures, the fairness of the process leading to the merger, or both, such applications create a troublesome and untimely distraction to merging parties focused on closing.  There is thus reason for defendants to consider a quick settlement that will resolve the litigation in its entirety, and secure a wide-ranging release of claims in exchange for nothing more than the inclusion of additional disclosures in the target company’s proxy statement. 

Click here to read the full article as published in the November 9, 2015 edition of The Temple 10-Q: Temple's Business Law Magazine.

Related Professionals

Media Contact

Lauren Kornsey, Senior Manager, Marketing and Business Development

About Potter Anderson

Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP is one of the largest and most highly regarded Delaware law firms, providing legal services to regional, national, and international clients. With more than 90 attorneys, the firm’s practice is centered on corporate law, corporate litigation, intellectual property, commercial litigation, bankruptcy, labor and employment, and real estate.

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.