Post-Closing Earnouts in M&A Transactions: Avoiding Common Disputes
The prospective parties to an M&A transaction often have different views regarding the value of the subject company, which can make it difficult to agree upon a purchase price. Of course, such different valuation perspectives may not be surprising given that the value of a business typically is determined by reference to its expected future performance or cash flows. The seller may be optimistic with regard to the future prospects, and therefore ascribe a higher value to a business than the buyer, which may be more conservative. One common way to bridge the gap between the parties’ valuation positions is to have a portion of the purchase price based on the future performance of the company. Such a provision, which is often called an “earnout,” entitles the seller to receive additional payments if the business meets certain contractual targets post-closing.
Click the link below to read the full article that was originally published in the Winter 2011 edition of Deal Points: The Newsletter of the Committee on Mergers and Acquisitions of the Business Law Section of the American Bar Association.
Lauren Kornsey, Senior Manager, Marketing and Business Development
About Potter Anderson
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP is one of the largest and most highly regarded Delaware law firms, providing legal services to regional, national, and international clients. With more than 90 attorneys, the firm’s practice is centered on corporate law, corporate litigation, intellectual property, commercial litigation, bankruptcy, labor and employment, and real estate.