Supreme Court Rules that a Bankruptcy Court's Order Adjudicating A Motion for Relief From the Automatic Stay Constitutes a Final, Immediately Appealable Order
Generally, in civil litigation, a court’s decision is considered “final” for purposes of appeal when the litigation ends so that there is nothing else for the court to adjudicate—in other words, when an entire case is concluded. The regime in bankruptcy, however, is different. A bankruptcy case, unlike other civil cases, is an aggregation of multiple individual controversies. The Supreme Court previously held in Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank, 575 U.S. 496, 501 (2015) that orders in bankruptcy cases qualify as “final” when they definitively dispose of discrete disputes within the overarching bankruptcy case. With the Bullard decision as a guide, the Supreme Court in Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC, 140 S. Ct. 582 (2020) recently addressed the issue of whether a dispositive ruling on a creditor’s motion for relief from the automatic stay is a final, appealable order and unanimously held that a bankruptcy court order unreservedly granting or denying relief from the automatic stay is a final, immediately appealable order.
Read the full article here.
Lauren Kornsey, Senior Manager, Marketing and Business Development
About Potter Anderson
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP is one of the largest and most highly regarded Delaware law firms, providing legal services to regional, national, and international clients. With more than 90 attorneys, the firm’s practice is centered on corporate law, corporate litigation, intellectual property, commercial litigation, bankruptcy, labor and employment, and real estate.